|
| |
P. Pallav, PhD
Introduction
The term erosion is applied to wear processes in which
a fluid (water, air, etc.) flows at a surface.
Most of the glossary in tribology has been established during the sixties of
the previous century. In the dental field, wear became interesting only some
twenty years later. What does it signify then that in dental literature the erosion caused by chewing
food is often called abrasion, a term,
which refers to a completely different wear mechanism?
|
Click
the picture to see the large (60kB) version.

The surfaces of Dispersalloy, an amalgam, exposed to erosive wear at the
left, abrasive wear at
the right, and a blend of these in the middle.
These surfaces are produced with the Acta
Wear Machine.
The
roughness of the eroded surface is mainly caused by minor differences in
the hardness of this material. The abrasively worn surface is about as smooth as the antagonist.
|
Clean and chemically inert fluids generally don't cause any
wear under oral flowing conditions.
In the oral environment erosion is
caused by specific components and properties of the fluid c.q. the food, which may contain abrasive particles. Material
loss strongly depends on physical properties of the
particles like strength and hardness, on the shear stress and
pressure which result from the motion of the
particles and on properties of the fluid such as
viscosity, affinity to the surface and surface tension.
Erosive Activity
| Erosive Activity = Pressure x Velocity Gradient |
| |
| EA = p · v', Equation 1 |
As far as we can tell the erosive wear rate is proportional to a parameter (p x v')
which we named Erosive Activity (Shearing
Action).
This is in fact a fluid mechanical adaptation of general wear
equation. The abundant deformations of the food during chewing require the use of fluid
mechanical principles if some assessment of erosive wear is to be made.
Application of the general wear
equation, (p x v) presents a problem, because normally in fluid mechanics it is
assumed that the velocity of the infinitely thin layer of a fluid at a surface
is equal to zero. So no wear at all would be predicted!
Obviously abrasive particles move over the surface
with a velocity
greater than zero. The particle in the figure will move with the average
velocity of the fluid in the layer marked d, which will be half the
velocity, which occurs at a distance d from the surface.
| vp = ½·d·v', Equation 2, |
| Where vp = |
Velocity and |
| d = |
Diameter of the Particle, and |
| v' = |
Velocity Gradient (tan(a)) |
So it may be concluded that the velocity of particles at the surface is proportional to
the velocity gradient.
If the Erosive Activity (EA) is defined as the product of pressure and velocity
gradient, the general wear equation for erosion can be
rewritten as
| Erosive Wear Rate = |
dh dt |
= k x EA, Equation 3, |
|
| Where p = |
Pressure, |
| v' = |
Velocity Gradient, |
| h = |
Height Loss, |
| t = |
Time Lapse, |
| k = |
Arbitrary Constant, and |
| EA = |
Erosive Activity |
|
The constant k depends on many properties of the fluid, the particles and the
surface material.
Detail
As the particles roll over the surface, the velocity at the top is less than
d x v', because the fluid slows down the downward motion at the front and the
upward at the rear.
The amount of friction with the fluid, the amount of 'grip' the fluid has on
the particle, would be proportional to its outside area, d2.
Therefore, the average micro amount of material loss, caused by a contact with
an abrasive particle might be estimated to be proportional to vp·d2, or v'·d3.
Because the volume of a particle is proportional to d3 as well, the wear rate
is theoretically independent of the particle size and varies only with the volume
percentage of abrasive particles.
|